Message to conservatives: Liberalism has caused our energy crisis
Written by Viguerie on Wed Jun 25 16:57:54 -0400 2008

The following is an e-mail that UltimateJohnMcCain.com publisher Richard A. Viguerie sent Tuesday to conservatives across the country:


Special Message to Conservatives

$4.00 Gas is a Teaching Moment for Conservatives


America’s energy problems have been brought to us courtesy of the
environmental movement and their political allies –
liberal Democrats and timid or complacent Republicans


Americans are justifiably upset with the high cost of gasoline and everything that depends on fuel—electricity, heating oil, food, truck transportation, airline tickets, and more.

Higher energy costs sets off a chain reaction that makes everything more expensive.

This public anger and alarm spells a major opportunity for conservatives because liberal policies and nonsensical regulations are directly responsible for higher energy prices. Energy prices provide a prime example to show how liberal policies are actually harmful to the poor, working families and the elderly – those whom liberal Democrats claim to be their “base.”

We conservatives must offer responsible, free-market solutions to this liberal mess.

In other words, this is a “teaching moment” for conservatives. We have a major opportunity to show the American public how the liberals have messed up their lives. High energy prices caused by bad liberal policies exemplify perfectly the differences between conservative principles and failed liberal ideology.

We must act now.

The biggest problem in doing this is our mindset. The lack of Republican leadership has put conservatives on the defense for so long that we’re forgetting how to play offense. So we in the conservative grassroots have to do the job ourselves. We’ve done it before—think of Catastrophic Health Act in the 80’s and HillaryCare in the ’90s. These successful battles were led by grass roots activist – not by national Republican leaders.

We’ve done it before and we can do it again.

We have to point out how the liberal worldview, which is that government – led by them, of course – needs to control everyone and everything. As with energy prices, central government control does not work.

In the attached article I give you the basic arguments we can use. We need to employ these arguments in every venue open to us including: talk radio, TV, press releases, syndicated columns, op-ed articles, newsletters, media interviews, letters to the editors, blogs, emails, and resolutions at political party meetings/conventions, local government meetings, political debates, etc., etc.

We have an opportunity for conservatives to take ownership of the #1 issue in America this summer and advance the conservative cause while putting the political left on the defensive.

Conservatives must provide the leadership because the establishment, big-government Republicans, as usual, have run for the tall grass and are AWOL.

When you look at the solutions that Democrats are offering to “fix” the energy crisis – more taxes and even proposals for socialization of the oil industry – and see the mostly timid, defensive solutions being offered by the Republican leadership – conservatives can see clearly that we must provide the missing leadership through our grass roots activism.

Let’s move on this one!

BELOW IS THE ARTICLE LINKED TO THE E-MAIL ABOVE. It is posted at http://conservativehq.com/news-from-the-front/liberalscausedcrisis.




Liberalism has caused our energy crisis / Free markets are the solution

As usual in a crisis, liberals are trying to take advantage of the situation. They are using the issue of high energy prices to push their agenda of oppressive regulation, ultra-high taxes, and the diversion of many billions of taxpayers’ dollars into “alternative fuel” efforts that, with few exceptions, are corporate-welfare scams.

Liberals want us to forget that they spent years pushing for higher prices. The New York Times, in an October 24, 2005 editorial, claimed that, “Cheap gas is no longer compatible with a secure nation, a healthy environment or a healthy economy – if ever it was.” On March 26, 2006, CNN’s Jack Cafferty said, “I hope gas prices go as high as they have to go to get the rest of these morons off the road in these big Hummers with the four wheel drive and the obscuring of the view for everybody else on the road...” The Christian Science Monitor, on May 12 of this year, in an editorial entitled “Why Pump Prices Need to Stay High,” declared, “Rather than prevent $4-a-gallon gas now, legislators should welcome it.”

Barack Obama June 10, 2008 on CNBC: “I think I would have preferred a gradual adjustment.” Which is to say, he’s for making life uncomfortable for Americans, just more slowly.

In their desire to “punish” higher gas consumption by some, liberals are willing to make gas, home fuel, and all food and goods transported to stores more expensive. To “punish” Cadillac drivers, liberals have in fact punished working families – and the elderly and the poor are the hardest hit – by high costs of oil.

And liberals want us to forget how their policies pushed us toward their goal of higher gas prices. In fact, they want “Big Oil,” Bush, Republicans, and conservatives to get the blame for what they did. And liberals can’t let our problems be solved, because then we wouldn’t need liberals anymore!

We can make this a “teaching moment” by helping America and the world see the effect that liberal policies have on people’s lives. By making energy more expensive, liberal policies make people poorer. By keeping us energy-dependent on foreign governments, including repressive regimes such as those in Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, liberal policies make the world a more dangerous place. By making energy more expensive and preventing use of domestic energy resources, liberals are causing the loss of American jobs. And by bottling up domestic energy resources through regulation, liberals encourage OPEC and other foreign oil sources to keep their prices inflated.

How did liberals accomplish these things?
They deliberately keep trillions of barrels of oil stuck in the ground, right here in the United States and offshore.
  • Exploration and drilling for oil is banned in the Alaskan wasteland, even though the area proposed for such use is tiny – 2000 acres, an area smaller than Washington Dulles Airport, in a “wildlife refuge” of 19,600,000 acres, about the size of South Carolina.
  • Of the 279 million acres of land under federal management where oil and natural gas could potentially be extracted, most is unavailable for exploration and drilling. Some 62% of all onshore lands are completely off-limits, and another 30% are tightly restricted.
  • The government does not allow development of oil shale and tar sands in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming.
  • The government does not allow new drilling for oil in the Outer Continental Shelf, where there’s an estimated 86 billion barrels of undiscovered recoverable oil and 420 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered recoverable natural gas. While U.S. companies can’t drill 100 miles off our shores, others, such as the partnership of Communist China and Cuba, can.
Meanwhile…
  • Due to excessive regulation and environmental protests, not a single oil refinery has been built in the United States in over 30 years.
  • For the same reasons, not a single nuclear power plant has been licensed in the United States in over 30 years.
  • Liberal policies have tightly restricted the use of coal, which is abundant in the United States.
  • Government regulations issued by liberals require that gasoline be reformulated for different regions of the country and different times of the year, causing simultaneous surpluses of some formulations and shortages of others, driving prices up and creating price disparities between different areas.
  • Liberal regulations also require that gasoline blends include ethanol, which pollutes worse than gasoline, furthers the destruction of the rainforest so that land can be freed up for growing corn, and drives up the price of everything related to corn, from eggs (chicken feed is mostly corn) to soda pop (which is sweetened with corn syrup). By the way, about one-third of recent increases in food prices worldwide have been attributed to ethanol, which means that ethanol has put tens of millions of people in poor countries at risk for starvation. A tank of ethanol uses enough corn to feed a person for a year.
  • Liberals raised taxes on gasoline so high that the government makes roughly four times as much on each gallon as the oil companies do. (Why doesn’t John McCain call that “obscene"?)
  • And liberals hike oil prices indirectly by engaging in out-of-control government spending and over-regulation of investments, driving down the value of the dollar and making everything bought from other countries (such as oil) more expensive.

We need to make it clear to the American people that liberals are standing in the way of cheaper and more abundant energy. Americans aren’t radical environmentalists. Rather, we are, as a whole, practical and responsible conservationists. For example, according to a recent Rasmussen poll, Americans support drilling off the coasts of Florida and California by 67% to 18%. That support included 57% of Democrats.

We can turn this issue around on the liberals. We’ve done it before.

In the 1970s, during an earlier energy crisis, liberals tried to take over the energy sector, with such policies as government price controls and “windfall profits taxes.” The result: They created gas lines, odd-even rationing, and Jimmy Carter’s Thermostat Police, all of which helped elect Ronald Reagan president. (Reagan then deregulated energy, which caused prices to drop and supplies to become abundant. “The economic realities of the marketplace,” he said, “have done more to bring down the price of oil than all those years of frenetic government regulating.”)

In the 1980s, liberals tried to dominate the foreign-policy debate, putting hundreds of thousands of protesters in the streets in opposition to President Reagan’s policies on the Cold War. The result: They stigmatized themselves, for decades, as people who cozy up to dictators and who try to make America weak.

In the 1990s, liberals attempted, with HillaryCare, a government takeover of the most important one-seventh of the American economy. The result: They produced such revulsion at the prospect of bureaucratic healthcare rationing that the American people gave the Republicans control of Congress for the first time in 40 years.

This time, as in the 1970s, liberals think they can use high energy prices to expand their power at the expense of all Americans. The liberal energy policies that concentrate power in Washington need to be repealed and replaced with practical and responsible policies based in the free market, policies that will open domestic energy production and reduce our dependency on foreign sources. This will:

  • reduce energy prices for all Americans including working families, the poor and the elderly;
  • reduce the costs of food and goods that must be transported to the market;
  • increase our own security, and reduce world tensions;
  • not just save American jobs being lost due to high energy costs, but actually increase the number of American jobs needed to tap into our vast but currently unused energy sources; and
  • bring down the costs of what foreign oil we do import by using domestic sources (competition works!).

Blog Comments

David Treibs
The article is a great start. Now, it we are really going to push this issue, we need corroborating research and articles: lots of people working on the same idea from different angles, and with findings that bolster what Mr. V. has already said.
david Pruitt
Richard a good article. While you are teaching let's set the record straight that there really is a conflict of globalism vs. nationalism (sovereignty/America first); not of liberal versus conservative. Secondly let's educate regarding the unfairest tax of all. The tax caused by a central bank, in this case the federal reserve, that makes the purchasing power of our dollars more worthless everyday. Heck the same silver quarter at the bottom of the great depression that paid for a galloon of gas at 20-25 cents will still buy a galloon of gas(1/4 oz. of silver approximately 4.25 to 4.50 today). Let's educate to the dangers of our central bank and why we need to get rid of it now. Thirdly let's talk about following the Constitution always and not just when it fits our agenda. A couple of quick examples: Congress needs to go back to coining money and backing it with gold and silver as mandated in the Constitution. Not abrogating that responsibility to a few elite banking families under the guise of the federal reserve. Let's hold our President, whether R or D, and all nationally elected office holders to their oath of office for a change. An oath that only swears to uphold the Constitution NOT to uphold our party loyalties whether R or D. A second example is in foreign policy. Let's remeber it is not America's job to police the world. The Constitution is very clear on how war must be declared. Police actions and Presidential signing directives do not count and never should have. I really hope you will dig a little deeper while you are educating. Most Americans need to hear it and the sooner the better as the public education system is dumbing students down more than ever. Frankly I feel that is on purpose. In a truly free society and Republic the population is highly educated and property rights are sacrosanct. We have drifted a long way from that mode. Regards, David 877-627-9211 x 115
Howard Hughes
I'm glad that this article didn't try to place the blame for high oil prices on the speculators. Speculators are not the cause of the problem.<P> In a free market there is a tendency toward the equalization of the price of a good in the present with the expected price of that good in the future. <p> The basis of this principle is the familiar fact that any discrepancy in price creates an opportunity for profit, the exploitation of which reduces the discrepancy.<p> The activity of speculators therefore serves to transfer supplies from a period on which they are less urgently needed, as indicated by their lower price to a period in which they are more urgently needed, as indicated by their higher price. In this way, it brings about the optimum rate of consumption of limited supplies.
DB
Thanks for the article. Please provide sources, or footnotes on where you got the information (for instance on the regulations so I may see who from my state voted for what), how the taxes break down on a gallon of gas compared to the profit oil companies take, etc. Talking points help, but knowing where those talking points come from would help a bit more. Thanks.
NotToday
From UPI. "Speculators use loop and oil prices rise Published: June 24, 2008 at 3:39 PM Speculative investment in crude oil adds up to 99 percent of the U.S. investment in the commodity, creating an inflationary process, analysts said. If regulators took the step of increasing cash requirements on oil futures contracts from the current 7.5 percent to 25 percent or more, "oil prices would collapse" Chief Executive Officer of TrimTabs Investment Research Charles Biderman told The Washington Times. Speculators can even dodge the 7.5 percent requirement using "the Enron loop," an exception allowed for electronic trading that is named for the company that lobbied for it, the Times said. With the Enron Loop, regulators in London and Dubai monitor electronic trading. "I'm sure that American consumers will take little comfort that they are being protected from manipulation and excessive speculation driving up gas prices -- not by U.S. regulators but by the Dubai government," Michael Greenberger, a law professor and former head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's division of trading told the Times. While increased global demand has played a part in oil price hikes, oil companies have estimated profit-oriented speculation in oil futures has doubled the price of oil above where market dynamics would have it, the Times reported." Who wrote the "Enron Exception?" Phil Graham. Who signed it into law? Bush 1. For those few who read this and want some facts rather than conservative crap, Google it. Your column is just so much conservative bullsh*t, Dick. As usual.
MIchael Pacifico
All excellent points that could dramatically reduce the price of oil, possibly by as much as 20-30%. But let us remember that perhaps an equally significant reason, if not more-so, is the devaluation of the US $. Over the same given time frame the price of oil in US dollars has quadrupled, while the price of oil in euros has little over doubled. This means had the $ not gone into a tailspin (and continues to do so, caused by seriously flawed monetary policy) the price of a barrel of oil would be below $80 (currently $135-140) and the price of a gallon of gas would be in the $2.80- $3 range. Now combine that with above sound ideas we would be talking about gas in the $2/gallon range, and ours sons and daughters would not be dying in the desert. We cannot count on our "leaders" to fix this. We must educate and motivate the masses, for that is the only way this will be taken care of.
Scott Harmon
All well and good, as there is simply too much protectionism and economic strangulation going on, everywhere. First off, American policymakers and Americans in general are stuck in this consumption economy, Industrial Age mindset, which leads to ... outsourcing of production to third-rate countries, including China, and encouragement to overproduce and over-import junk and baubles we don't need; over-protectionism of trade routes and trade sectors to insure these goods are consumed here; and finally, to ridiculous economic schemes (NAFTA, CAFTA), military occupations and buildups all over the planet, and a bottomless pit known as the Defense Department to keep it all intact. Of course, this leads to more and more consumption--gas for the military--and economic theories that demand we keep circulating more and more money (thereby inflating the costs of things at home)... and on and on. The real fact of the matter is not gasoline--we could get by with far less of it, if we changed our Industrialized attitudes about work, used the Internet more, and started building a more advanced economy. In some ways, we would have to localize the economy more, to keep down costs. change our work habits, etc. I mean, is it necessary to fly everywhere (there's another gas gobbler) to conduct business? I'm afraid the multinational corporations, the politicos, and the big-businesses slaved to a high-consumption and warfare economy are the ones who can't change. Let China build its car fleet, and produce every toy on the planet--that doesn't mean it has to affect us, unless, of course, we continue having the Federal Reserve disrupt what the "free market" would surely squeeze out.
Penguin ComPassion
Count me in! I want to print this article and hand it to as many friends, family, and other people as I can. The truth is the liberal position is actually against the very people they claim to help which is the poor. IT'S TIME TO ACT AND FAST. DON'T WAIT FOR REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP TO GET THE MESSAGE ACROSS. WE NEED TO DO THIS NOW! OUR FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT. IMAGINE, JUST ABOUT ANYTHING NEGATIVE THE LIBERALS BRING ABOUT IS BECAUSE THEY'RE SO ANGRY AT THOSE WHO DRIVE THE WRONG KIND OF VEHICLE.
Ben Black
A challenge to all those that cry foul in a response to government action trying to mitigate the fleecing of the American public... This spike in oil prices was inevitable, however it is hardly based on the reasons that many people in the above posts seem to conveniently blame on the Democratic party. Record profits for oil companies and the biggest representation of oil men in the highest office in the land SHOULD raise red flags, however I see no mention of this anywhere. Alternative energies (and no, I do not mean corn-based ethanol) should find substantial investment, in the interest of keeping operating/living costs down for all of the American people. The world is changing, and we need to react to these problems through innovation, NOT by blaming democrats and dispensing this ridiculous propaganda of off-shore drilling and opening up ANWAR. This is not an immediate nor is it an effective solution, and all those who feign this to be so are either ignorant, or are being disingenuous to their fellow countrymen- not to mention continuing the divisiveness that we as a nation are allowing to tear us apart. Oil has proven to be a source of MAJOR problems in these uncertain times. I do not advocate over-taxation, but I DO advocate increased fuel standards and investment in alternative energies. If we continue to rely on oil and avoid moving towards a cleaner more efficient solution, we are all in big trouble. Let's practice responsibility, reduce the influence of greed that is KILLING THIS NATION, and avoid reckless consumption without conscience. In many ways NOT doing these things is precisely why our dollar has deteriorated. Let's transcend this sort of typical pass the buck political hooey. PS- The market is only free until Bear Stearns needs a bailout. Just one example why this argument is an illusion.
sbell
i think this article is silly and i'm trying to escape the "blame the other side" mentality that BOTH sides engage in. its so immature. i am not a fan of the democratic wastefulness but to propose that the republicans are completely free of any responsibility of the state of our economy and don't contribute to wastefulness is ridiculous. Just read about Essential Air Service and there are many Republican supporters of that. drilling for more oil is not the answer either. we have some of the best technology on the planet and we are choosing to drill for more oil? its insane. im stationed here in germany where entire neighborhoods are powered from solar power. why? BECAUSE IT MAKES SENSE. their gas is 2 euro a LITER-not gallon- which is like 7 bucks a gallon to them- and you dont hear them complain half as much as americans do. probably because their cars get 45 mpg and they are not dumb enough to drive hummers. our country needs to get out of the stone age. its a reckless and ignorant solution to drill for more oil in a wildlife refuge anyway. ITS A REFUGE FOR A REASON.
MarcoVincenzo
The article has some interesting points, but it misses the main ones. The current energy "crisis" has three main causes: 1) government spending; congress, both democrats and republicans, has racked up 9 trillion dollars in current debt and almost 60 trillion dollars in liabilities. 2)The Federal Reserve just keeps on printing money like there's no tomorrow. Real inflation (include all the items we have to buy that get left out of the "official" numbers) is running well over 10%, which means every dollar in circulation is worth that much less. And 3, the war in Iraq. If we ever want freedom and liberty at home we can't afford to be an imperial power abroad--especially when we have to borrow the money from China to wage our wars of conquest. The other items in the article do have an effect, but if we don't address the main ones, dealing with the minor ones won't have much impact on the situation.
Robert Edward Johnson
While prices would be lowered if we'd follow Viguerie's proposals (ANWR, nuclear energy, repeal stupid refining laws, etc.), and while I favor that, and while the left's critiques of American excess, if implemented (e.g., stop buying stupid Hummers, 4WD truuuhhhhcks, etc.), would also lower energy prices, NEITHER side is talking about what actually CAUSED the runup of oil from $47 in Jan. 18, 2007 to the present $142. I'd hoped Viguerie would, but he didn't, but since Michael Pacifico and Marco Vincenzo did, let me congratulate them and reiterate some points they made. There are four principle reasons oil prices went up, three of which we can do something to reverse: 1) Indian and Chinese buying (do you really believe that this is what's almost tripled oil? please!); 2) the decline of the US dollar; 3) continued violence in Iraq; 4) OPEC's attitudes and policies towards the US. Points 2, 3, and 4 would all arguably be solved if we'd stop our presence in the idiotic, insane, ignorant war in Iraq. Our deficit spending for the war has helped trash the dollar, as have the so-called stimulus package whose main fruit seems to have been a 11,340 Dow Friday (great work Bernanke, Bush, etc.), although only about 25% of the price rise is attributable to the decline of the dollar, easily checked by looking at exchange rates in Jan 2007 versus now. Our continued presence in Iraq also arguably makes the violence worse, not only because we remain a poster boy for insurgent recruiting ("get rid of the Infidels!") but because we're actually holding back the Iraqi government in ruthlessly slaughtering the insurgents as we held back the South Vietnamese ("YOU can't shoot that guy with a revolver just because he raped your wife and then slaughtered her and the rest of your family - you FORGOT to say 'MOTHER MAY I?'!!!"), which means that the usual things that make oil prices rise - threats of pipelines being cut and oil fields being torched - continue. Moreover, since OPEC NEVER seems to like us Infidels meddling in the Holy Lands, is there anyone stupid enough to think that our continued presence in Iraq HELPS us with OPEC? Uh, no. Hopefully Viguerie will begin to take a more Ron Paul/Bob Barr approach instead of simply parroting Fox.
Ken S.
I would propose we the people make petition, holding all persons holding office, having oathed upholding the constitution, be held accountable and simply use their voting recordsas evidence. That should take care of McCain and Obama, Hillery and Cheney, and the list will expose itself. All laws and legislation contrary to said constitution be repealed, availing the opportunity for the nation to move forward. Those filling the criminally vacated positions will be well aware the we as a people will not put up with such politics again.
William Freivogel
Cheney is the architect of this country's energy strategy. Remember the secret meetings early in this administration. No disclosure of who participated nor what was decided. It has all worked beautifully. Enormous oil company profits and enormous incomes for the executives. God, is, indeed, in his heaven. By the way, what was Jeb Bush's position on drilling off the coast of Florida? For how many years did he successfully keep that from happening? Why didn't W initiate a reversal of Clinton's energy regulations? Too busy with gay marriage? The Swift Boating has begun.
Bruce Minnick
Please. Stop. If anyone out there in Imagination City can please provide me with the name of one single "liberal" person in America who owns an oil well, or one "liberal" American who owns any more than .001% of the outstanding shares of common stock in Shell Oil Company, or Exxon/Mobile Oil, Chevron, or Texaco, or in any other international oil conglomerate raking in billions of dollars per month, I will vote for John McBush. You people are crazy.

New Comment




simple_captcha.jpg
(type the code from the image)